- 10x better with AI
- Posts
- Writing While Walking
Writing While Walking
How AI Freed Me (Partly) From My Desk
10xbetter.ai is a weekly newsletter for professionals ready to transform themselves for the AI era, focusing not just on tools and news, but on who you need to become to matter tomorrow.
In this newsletter:
Writing while Walking
Red Panda's Identity Revealed
Computer-Using AI Has Arrived
The Lazy Expert's Guide to Perfect Midjourney Prompts
Ideally, a walk is just for walking.
But I have a lot to get through in a day.
So I imagined myself strolling through the neighbourhood, a typewriter strapped to my chest, desperately trying to tap out my thoughts while dodging trees and concerned neighbours.
I then realised I'm not ready for this future.
And neither are my neighbours.
But still, I thought – to quote the Beach Boys – wouldn't it be nice, on those busy days, to get some writing done and some movement in at the same time?
The Walking-Thinking Connection
Walking has always been the secret to deep thinking.
Away from screens and notifications, the mind wanders freely, making connections that stay stubbornly hidden when you're hunched over a keyboard.
For years, I've had my best ideas during walks.
An Unexpected Breakthrough
But what if we could not just think but write while walking? Mind you: not with a chest-mounted typewriter but through something far more elegant: AI-powered dictation.
This morning, I discovered that Claude.ai's newly updated dictation feature has quietly transformed the walking-writing equation.
I've been supremely frustrated with Apple's native dictation, and it's probably going to take years before it will be as good as OpenAI's Whisper dictation platform in the EU, what with the AI Act and all.
But dictating to Claude.ai, the accuracy and natural flow are remarkable enough that I wrote this entire piece while walking through my neighbourhood. It wasn’t perfect. But neither is sitting at my desk all day.
A sidenote about high- and low value AI applications
Incidentally, this also demonstrates the difference between high-value and low-value AI. Me dictating my thoughts during the morning walk is a low-value use case. So what if it gets something wrong? I'll have 10 new ideas in the next 2 minutes.
But last week news broke that medical professionals have been using OpenAI's Whisper platform for dictating patient reports. And it turns out that it sometimes "hallucinates" in transcriptions.
In that field, the accuracy of AI transcription is literally a matter of life and death. Similarly with self-driving cars or using AI in construction.
So people working in a high impact field need to be cautious about just adopting the tech just because it seems to make life easier.
For most creative professions, however, we don't have these kinds of high-value cases. We need good-enough accuracy that maintains our creative flow, with the ability to easily correct and refine.
Why This Matters for You
Think about your typical workday. How many hours do you spend sitting, trying to force creativity while staring at your screen? What if you could:
Draft emails during your morning walk
Outline presentations while getting fresh air
Write reports while moving through nature
Stay healthy while staying productive
The Bigger Picture
Walking while working fundamentally transforms our relationship with productivity.
AI tools now offer an unprecedented opportunity to break free from our desks while maintaining output.
Here we find the sweet spot: technology enhancing our natural thinking processes rather than constraining them.
Your Turn
I'm curious: Have you tried combining movement with work?
What's holding you back?
Share your thoughts or experiences – I'll be reading your responses during tomorrow's walk.
Written entirely while walking, with an AI assistant considerably lighter than a typewriter.
AI Signal of the Week: Red Panda's Identity Revealed
The mysterious "Red Panda" AI image generator that suddenly jumped to the top of an AI leaderboard has been unveiled as Re-craft.ai, a newcomer specialising in handling text-heavy images - a persistent pain point in AI image generation.
While Re-craft.ai generates more readable text than Midjourney, it currently trades off some of Midjourney's stunning visual quality to achieve this text clarity.
I tested both this week and included comparison shots below - as you can see, Recraft can handle longer text but my conclusion is that Midjourney still blows other image generators out of the water in terms of image quality.
Text generation just isn't there yet. Of course there is also Ideogram, but it only does short text well, in my experience.
Imperfect results prompting Recraft.ai (left) and Midjourney (right)
The text-in-image challenge remains one of AI's most frustrating unsolved problems - despite billions in investment and years of development, even the best models still struggle with long-form text generation in images, suggesting this could be the next major breakthrough area in AI imaging.
Why This Matters For You: Text-heavy visuals (presentations, infographics, social media cards) are the backbone of business communication - whoever cracks the text-in-image problem will transform how we create visual business content. (If you're using Midjourney, don't miss this week's Power Move tutorial below for advanced insights on prompting techniques)
Future Focus: Computer-Using AI Has Arrived
Remember teaching your parents how to use a computer? ("No, the other mouse button!") Well, AI just enrolled in the same class – and the implications are massive.
Anthropic's Claude can now use computers like we do: clicking buttons, typing text, and navigating screens. Think of it as giving AI an actual driver's license for your computer instead of just being a backseat driver.
Some experts are sounding alarm bells. Web developer Morten Rand-Hendriksen warns this could enable sophisticated scams – imagine AI impersonating your voice while clicking through websites. His stance? Just because we can build it doesn't mean we should.
But here's the thing: This capability represents exactly what many people have been waiting for – AI that can handle those mind-numbing sequences of clicks and keystrokes that eat up our workdays.
While the current version is reportedly "slow and error-prone," remember what AI experts always say: This is as bad as the technology will ever be. It will only get better from here.
Power Take: Whether we embrace it or resist it, AI is stepping out of the chat window and into our actual workflow. The question isn't if this will transform how we work - that’s for sure. The real question is how we'll adapt to work alongside it.
The Lazy Expert's Guide to Perfect Midjourney Prompts
Midjourney can take care of it’s own art direction, thank you very much
While many guides advocate for complex prompt engineering, my recent experiments with Midjourney have revealed a surprising truth: simpler prompts often produce more aesthetically pleasing results. After extensive use and training Midjourney to understand my personal aesthetic preferences, I've discovered that less is definitely more.
Training Midjourney on Your Style
Before we dive in, it's worth noting that my results are influenced by consistently using Midjourney and developing what I consider my "aesthetic signature."
The more you use Midjourney to rank images side by side, the more it learns your style preferences. This means that even simple prompts can produce highly personalised results that align with your visual taste.
The “Traditional” Framework
Many Midjourney guides recommend this structured approach:
[Subject] with [Key Attributes], in [Style and Mood], featuring [Colors and Lighting], including [Optional Elements]. [Exclusions]
Because writing such detailed prompts can be tedious, many users turn to AI assistants like Claude.ai to generate these complex prompts. While this makes the process easier, it often leads to overcomplicated results that lose their conceptual clarity.
The Problem with AI-Generated Complexity
Let's look at some prompts typically generated by AI assistants:
Sound Visualisation
Compare the output of the first complex prompt with the second more simple one
AI-Generated prompt: "A three-dimensional soundwave visualization of a whalesong with frequency spectrum analysis and harmonic overtone patterns, featuring depth-mapped color gradients and temporal rhythm indicators, including decibel level markers and species-specific vocal pattern annotations."
Prompt: “sound wave”
Another example: Neural Networks
Prompt: "A real-tme visualization of a convolutional neural network with active neuron pathways and weighted connection strengths, featuring heat-mapped activation patterns and decision threshold indicators, including layer-wise feature extraction visualization and error propagation trails.
Compare the complexity above with the simplicity below
Prompt: “Neural Network”
Last Example: Dance Movement
Again, first complex, then simple.
Prompt "high-speed capture of a break-dancing power move with multiple exposure motion trails and gravity-defying momentum, featuring stroboscopic lighting at 1/1000th second intervals, including force vector overlays and joint stress indicators."
The image above is not bad, but not as compelling as the one below:
Prompt: "dance move"
I don’t know about you, but for me all this clearly steers me in the the direction of: “Make your prompts as simple as possible.”
So while many so-called experts advice us to use AI to help us generate elaborate prompts, these often create busy, overcrowded images where the core concept gets lost in technical specifications.
The simpler prompts, however, produce clearer, more aesthetically pleasing results that better capture the essence of what we're trying to visualize.
Why Simple Works Better
1. Conceptual Clarity: Simple prompts focus on the core idea without getting lost in details
2. Aesthetic Freedom: The AI can apply its trained understanding of composition and style without conflicting instructions
3. Better Interpretation: Less conflicting information means clearer artistic direction
4. Visual Impact: Clean, focused images often have more immediate appeal
5. Personal Style: Simple prompts allow your trained aesthetic to shine through
The Power of Personal Style
What makes this simple approach particularly effective is the relationship you develop with Midjourney over time. As you:
Select and upscale specific variations
Create new versions of images you like
Consistently choose certain styles and aesthetics
The AI begins to understand your preferences, making simple prompts increasingly effective at producing results that match your vision.
When to Use Complex Prompts
The structured framework and AI-assisted prompt generation still have their place:
Technical documentation needs
Exact brand requirements
Scientific visualisation
Specific architectural or product renders
Situations requiring precise control over multiple elements
But in all these cases, there are many other models that will produce results that will more closely adhere to your prompts, but are (I find) less aesthetic.
The New Approach to Prompting
Start with the core concept (2-3 words)
Add only essential modifiers if neede
Trust the AI's artistic training
Iterate based on results, not specifications
Consistently upscale and create variations of images that match your aesthetic
Let your personal style evolve naturally through consistent use
Building Your Aesthetic
Instead of spending time crafting elaborate prompts, focus on:
- Identifying what you like in generated images
Creating variations of successful results
Developing a consistent style through your choices
Learning which simple prompt words trigger the best results
Building a library of effective, simple prompts
The goal is to create compelling visuals, not to write technical specifications.
Sometimes the most powerful prompt is the simplest one, enhanced by your developed aesthetic relationship with the AI. L
Let Midjourney learn your style, and you'll find that less really does become more.